Re: @!!$$%!*!(@)!!$$(!$&
Okay everyone, Dryunya's here, this shouldn't take long.
SpiritfChaos wrote:Okay everyone, Dryunya's here, this shouldn't take long.
Dryunya wrote:It would be easier if that thing said anything.

Dryunya wrote:For the record, it followed me on twitter just now.
Apparently, we can has lolcats.
UPD: The jpg has no metadata, no rarjpegs. Recoverable binary code is:
11001?0*
110010011001??011001*
01110011011000*
01110010011001*
01110011011000*
01*
01*
(? is one missing symbol, * - zero or more)
There may be steganographics involved, but that will have to wait until I get home.
Meanwhile, you tell me if the content itself rings a bell. He says he has been here before. And there is a cat. But I don't think Cheshire fits the profile - too technical.
The Wild West Pyro wrote:010000100110010100100000011100110111010101110010011001
010010000001110100011011110010000001100100011100100110
100101101110011010110010000001111001011011110111010101
110010001000000100111101110110011000010110110001110100
01101001011011100110010100101110
Scarab wrote:The Wild West Pyro wrote:010000100110010100100000011100110111010101110010011001
010010000001110100011011110010000001100100011100100110
100101101110011010110010000001111001011011110111010101
110010001000000100111101110110011000010110110001110100
01101001011011100110010100101110
...Pyro, I don't know what you DID, and I'm no expert, but erm... but I don't think you can translate binary INTO binary. (Can you?)
What IS IT with us and cats? >.<
Matrx wrote:Be sure to drink your Ovaltine.
Victin wrote:Actually Pyro, your binary into binary code translates to:Matrx wrote:Be sure to drink your Ovaltine.
Dryunya wrote:I tried to poke the image with steganographic tools and got nothing. I'm terrible with those, so I'll list what I actually did:
- Skipped the tools that don't specify the algorithms they use.
- Aimed for LSB and the like, because they are the simplest and the most common for applications like this one (the GM wants us to find the answer eventually, not spend our lifetime cracking it - there are countless other algorithms, most of which accept some parameters that increase the search space even further).
- Tried to use OpenStego, which I recall was used to solve the last Cabal puzzle. Turns out, it only works on PNG, and converting the image (which, assuming perfect conversion, should retain the hidden message) still gives no results.
Of course, you are free to try it yourself. I liked the VSL kit (visually), but I'm not sure it even worked properly.
My conclusion is that there probably aren't any messages that are meant to be extracted with dedicated tools. To put it simply, unlocking it would require the exact same tools and parameters as locking it, which we can't know. There might be other, less formal ways to hide a message, which would require a notepad, photoshop, and squinting.![]()
Also, this is just a hunch, but I think the binary is a red herring. Won't stop me from examining it later...
Matrx wrote:update 1 2 back forth update 1 2 step back update 1 2 here i am back forth step back here i am
Dryunya wrote:By the way, we are paying attention to the image itself, while the message it's attached to might mean something as well.Matrx wrote:update 1 2 back forth update 1 2 step back update 1 2 here i am back forth step back here i am
Scarab wrote:Hang on, so far we have... lolcats and de-motivational/motivational posters and binary. Bit mememish...
Could it be DIVERSITY rather than adversity?
Dryunya wrote:There is no room for another 'I'. If anything, the word follows the following regexp (nerd nerd):
[A-Z]*[RPDB]V[EF][PDBR]SIT[A-Z]*
Here [A-Z]* is any number of any letters, [ABC] is A, B or C. "Adversity" is the only thing I could see in there.
Mid-post UPD: I have googled up this handy thingy, and it told me "Perversity" also fits. But if you look closely, 1st and 4th letters in the image are slightly different, so it can't be "Perversity".
Regarding the new tweet - there is nothing I can see in there, except that it disproves my theory that Matrx only posts technical stuff in this thread. Somebody just button-mashed a lot. Most of the characters come from the middle row, so I thought I could assign a 0-9 number to each of them, but there were a couple of characters from other rows, so that approach failed.