Watch the Footage

First, let's not blow this as we did the first time by not lynching anyone. If no one dies, it's only going to skew the odds in mafia's favor. (Granted, a wrong kill will skew it even further, but we'll have to risk it. ) Again, I have no information to decide who to vote for, and I may change my mind later.

I say we lynch Qara before she stabs somebody. No offense. >_>

UPD:

Krika wrote:Look, nobody would willingly tell people to lynch themselves, right? I think she's trying to fake us out, since on one had she could be the Mafia trying to make us think that she's not the Mafia (since why would the Mafia try to kill themselves?).

So, to sum up I think we should kill Narra.

Connect the dots for me?

Narra was mafia last time, though. I'd say the odds of her drawing it twice in a row are exceedingly remote.

I vote Tohr. She clearly has a guilty conscience.

The masons are a new thing, by the way - I've never heard of them in other game versions. Since they're all town-aligned, it would be beneficial for us to figure out who they are.
And if you do figure it out, keep it to yourself or they won't last long.

How can I have a guilty conscience if I haven't killed anyone yet?

That's a fantastic question, to which I respond: why do you think killing yourself would solve anything?

JackAlsworth wrote:Narra was mafia last time, though. I'd say the odds of her drawing it twice in a row are exceedingly remote.

Randomness doesn't depend on past events. It may be a remote chance that it happens twice in a row, but no less of a chance that it turns out to be any other specific person.

Since we have no evidence right now, I have to judge based on behaviour in the thread thus far. That being the case, I'll probably be rather quiet (so that nobody can make "judgements" based on my behaviour) and then pipe up at the last minute once I've seen how people are acting.

(Yes, I realise the flaw in that logic; if everybody did that, the thread would be quiet. I'm also not entirely sure this is the *best* way to play what is essentially a party game. It may be the most efficient, but I recognise that the game is about having fun and not ruthlessly murderising everybody.)

(...wait, the game *is* about ruthlessly murderising everybody? Awesome!)

Sophira wrote:Since we have no evidence right now, I have to judge based on behaviour in the thread thus far. That being the case, I'll probably be rather quiet (so that nobody can make "judgements" based on my behaviour) and then pipe up at the last minute once I've seen how people are acting. [/size]

It is possible to go too far in that direction, so that everyone thinks you're being quiet just to allay suspicion.

Striking the right balance to seem like you're participating but not overeager is tricky.

Personally, I'd rather just cast and observe the results... So, might as well start off by killing Jack.

Dryunya wrote:I say we lynch Qara before she stabs somebody.

If you lynch me I will stab you.

I vote lynch Tohr because that way everybody's happy.

I vote for whoever has the second highest amount of votes, if I can do that. If not... I vote for Jack. :|

I have a list in the first post of how many votes everyone has, y'know.

That would be narra. Confirm?

For variety, I vote to lynch Endless, he seems to be holding a rather large grudge.

Tempted to vote for eli now. :P But no, my vote's for narra.

I don't suppose it's possible to add a poll to the thread and continue modifying it? I know some forums can do that, and it would be really handy to have here.

The polls on this forum only have 10 options max. Once we get three folks knocked out, I think I can set one up.

jack are you suggesting we indiscriminately stab everyone until there are few enough people to make a poll :<
because if so I'll go get the knives

Well, I'm not suggesting "indiscriminately," I'm just assuming that, Mafia being Mafia, three people will be summarily offed before long.

Guys I think that Qara and Jack may be in cahoots.

Seems like a perfectly innocent conversation to me. *glares at Narra, muttering*

Krika there is no need to treat me with such suspicion.

I like the word cahoots.
eli would you like to cahoot with me?

narrativedilettante wrote:Krika there is no need to treat me with such suspicion.

I'm sorry, but you're the name I rolled. I must therefore treat you with suspicion.

Krika is also suspicious with his two-face-like quality of deciding alliances by die rolls.

eli_gone_crazy wrote:Krika is also suspicious with his two-face-like quality of deciding alliances by die rolls.

On the other hand, this means that I have no set agenda that you need to worry about.

Unless you're just saying that to mislead us. I'm onto you. >:|