Page 3 of 3
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:46 pm
by RotavatoR
I knew the exact number as well. She's right
You a big fan, foxy?

Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:46 pm
by NeverSlender
RotavatoR wrote:I've recently started playing it again because I discovered a new Self-Imposed Challenge: Nuzlocke run.
Basically you can catch only the first pokemon you find in a location, and you're not allowed to use a pokemon again if it faints.
Pretty tough x)
(And there are about 650 I think)
I saw one where you have to release a pokemon if it faints.
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:47 pm
by Scarab
NeverSlender wrote:RotavatoR wrote:I've recently started playing it again because I discovered a new Self-Imposed Challenge: Nuzlocke run.
Basically you can catch only the first pokemon you find in a location, and you're not allowed to use a pokemon again if it faints.
Pretty tough x)
(And there are about 650 I think)
I saw one where you have to release a pokemon if it faints.
Wow, tough...
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:47 pm
by RotavatoR
NeverSlender wrote:RotavatoR wrote:I've recently started playing it again because I discovered a new Self-Imposed Challenge: Nuzlocke run.
Basically you can catch only the first pokemon you find in a location, and you're not allowed to use a pokemon again if it faints.
Pretty tough x)
(And there are about 650 I think)
I saw one where you have to release a pokemon if it faints.
Yeah, it's kinda like that, but instead you keep em in a box, cuz you might need them for HM's.
And you have to nickname the pokemon (to develop bonds, and surprisingly, it kinda works

)
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:48 pm
by Tyltalis
(I personally like the concept, but the games are a bit dull and the show sucks)
About 648 individual species.
And I think the one that you reffer to about release when fainted is a 'Nuzlocke' challenge. Not very hard if you have a good team.
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:49 pm
by JackAlsworth
Tyltalis wrote:(I personally like the concept, but the games are a bit dull and the show sucks)
About 648 individual species.
And I think the one that you reffer to about release when fainted is a 'Nuzlocke' challenge. Not very hard if you have a good team.
*obligatory "over 9000" joke*
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:50 pm
by The Finch
Tyltalis wrote:(I personally like the concept, but the games are a bit dull and the show sucks)
About 648 individual species.
And I think the one that you reffer to about release when fainted is a 'Nuzlocke' challenge. Not very hard if you have a good team.
>I like the concept but the games are a bit dull
Ok.
>and the show sucks.
If generation 1 or 2, ALL OF MY HATE
If any others, go on.
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:51 pm
by NeverSlender
RotavatoR wrote:NeverSlender wrote:RotavatoR wrote:I've recently started playing it again because I discovered a new Self-Imposed Challenge: Nuzlocke run.
Basically you can catch only the first pokemon you find in a location, and you're not allowed to use a pokemon again if it faints.
Pretty tough x)
(And there are about 650 I think)
I saw one where you have to release a pokemon if it faints.
Yeah, it's kinda like that, but instead you keep em in a box, cuz you might need them for HM's.
And you have to nickname the pokemon (to develop bonds, and surprisingly, it kinda works

)
There's also another I saw, where you only use the first six pokemon you get.
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:52 pm
by Tyltalis
The first three were not that bad, I enjoyed how they depicted the battles. It's mostly just the 4th and 5th generations I don't quite like.
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:54 pm
by NeverSlender
I liked all of them, but I preferred 3rd gen, cos I played it on an emulator at 10x speed. Made it much easier to level.
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:54 pm
by RotavatoR
I thought Hoenn was a beautiful region with beautiful music and very interesting pokemon.
A dinosaur with leaf wings and bananas on its neck?
BAD. ASS.
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:57 pm
by Tyltalis
Hoenn is the best in my opinion. It was just such a change from the first two. Infact, my username is that of a Pokemon which was first introduced in that region.
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:58 pm
by Pixelmage
RotavatoR wrote:I thought Hoenn was a beautiful region with beautiful music and very interesting pokemon.
A dinosaur with leaf wings and bananas on its neck?
BAD. ASS.
Tropius is ok. But Absol is the 3rd gen lord. A disaster premonition? Make that my favorite.
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:59 pm
by RotavatoR
Tyltalis wrote:Hoenn is the best in my opinion. It was just such a change from the first two. Infact, my username is that of a Pokemon which was first introduced in that region.
Oh, Altaria, I gotcha. I had to look that one up

pretty cool :3
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 7:59 pm
by NeverSlender
Pixelmage wrote:RotavatoR wrote:I thought Hoenn was a beautiful region with beautiful music and very interesting pokemon.
A dinosaur with leaf wings and bananas on its neck?
BAD. ASS.
Tropius is ok. But Absol is the 3rd gen lord. A disaster premonition? Make that my favorite.
Metagross/Rayquaza. Done.
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:00 pm
by Inukai44
Recently I just beat Resident Evil 6 it was really good now i'm setting my sights on Assassins Creed 3
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:02 pm
by Pixelmage
NeverSlender wrote:Metagross/Rayquaza. Done.
Legendary and pseudo legendary. OP. Think normal levels, please?
Also, yes, Rayquaza is my favorite legendary ever.

Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:05 pm
by NeverSlender
Pixelmage wrote:NeverSlender wrote:Metagross/Rayquaza. Done.
Legendary and pseudo legendary. OP. Think normal levels, please?
Also, yes, Rayquaza is my favorite legendary ever.

Aggron
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:07 pm
by RotavatoR
Nosepass
...Although his leg made him look like he was whistling in the sprites

Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:08 pm
by NeverSlender
Ahem.

Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:09 pm
by Pixelmage
NeverSlender wrote:Ahem.

Broken image link.
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:10 pm
by NeverSlender
Pixelmage wrote:NeverSlender wrote:Ahem.

Broken image link.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 8:11 pm
by RotavatoR
I honestly don't know how
Save me from my stupidity :'(
i mean i found that Img option all right, but then what
Re: Gaming?

Posted:
Mon Oct 15, 2012 9:34 pm
by ree264
liking my thread guys?