I didn't do that just because all I was doing was getting that feeling of uselessness out of my chest.
Ed is right, of course. So is Gurt and Adell. Let's keep this kicking.



NeverSlender wrote:On a side note, how would you have handled the situation if no one had written a story?

NeverSlender wrote:I think people are looking at this the wrong way. You're looking at how you've change things when you should be looking at how you've furthered things. Finding blogs, giving characters advice, finding echoes, piecing the URL together, solving the dancing men. This is the impact we have.
Gurt wrote:NeverSlender wrote:On a side note, how would you have handled the situation if no one had written a story?
We're fictional. We can't lift a finger without an author. If no one wrote anything, you'd be having a starin contest with a Gorgon right now. I know that sounds like fun to Angel, but the rest of us might have a hard time of it.
NeverSlender wrote:I'm not entirely sure how seriously we can take the answers from the AMA. They were mostly about dartboards, toilets and fridges.
Gurt wrote:Guys, I'm an Ascended Lime. I wouldn't even exist if you hadn't made an inside joke, run with it, and submitted it as a story to Mr. A--in a contest that was your idea!
Maybe we need to find some other subplot to occupy ourselves? NeverSlender wrote:I think people are looking at this the wrong way. You're looking at how you've change things when you should be looking at how you've furthered things. Finding blogs, giving characters advice, finding echoes, piecing the URL together, solving the dancing men. This is the impact we have.


Dryunya wrote:No offense, Gurt, but I've raised that point back in the megathread: the metaguard idea was approved because, technically, it didn't require to alter the plot. At all. It's just that we had something to do, and you get some random encounters here and there.
That said, though, I adore the metaguard subplot. It's that emergent behaviour that actually brings life to it.Maybe we need to find some other subplot to occupy ourselves?
![]()

Dryunya wrote:It isn't. We haven't moved an inch with the Cabal. It's the same story as back then when we tried to prove that Holmes' client is Moriarty - and, in fact, we're doing it again.It's inconclusive, and I don't even think we are to find Cabal on the net - unlike us, they actually give a damn about hiding their discussions.
Basically, all we get is some rough estimate to point to and say "told you" when the solution is thrown at us.
NeverSlender wrote:How long ago did we find the cabal? Only a couple of days. This could be a long running plot thread over months. ARGs can last years, we're not gonna solve everything quickly.
Pixelmage wrote:So, Dryu, what say you we actually make a real proposal for the Humanoid Interface?

Dryunya wrote:No offense, Gurt, but I've raised that point back in the megathread: the metaguard idea was approved because, technically, it didn't require to alter the plot.
NeverSlender wrote:GMs really shouldn't be allowed on meta threads.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest