Endless Sea wrote:Come on, guys, I've been asking for a while for my tropes to be edited now. At least tell me what's wrong with the ones I'm asking for, if you've got any problems.
Me too. I want more tropes too, please.
Endless Sea wrote:Come on, guys, I've been asking for a while for my tropes to be edited now. At least tell me what's wrong with the ones I'm asking for, if you've got any problems.

Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:Speaking of character pages, I'm, ah, very tempted to add a section for the GMs to that page. Though maybe we should run that by them first...![]()
Plus we'd have to figure out how to do it: One section for all of them? One per person? Entries with tropes their sock accounts displayed? Only tropes they displayed since the endgame? Tropes they displayed amongst each other on their end, presumably suggested by each other in much the same way we've been doing for us?

Qara-Xuan Zenith wrote:Speaking of character pages, I'm, ah, very tempted to add a section for the GMs to that page. Though maybe we should run that by them first...![]()
Plus we'd have to figure out how to do it: One section for all of them? One per person? Entries with tropes their sock accounts displayed? Only tropes they displayed since the endgame? Tropes they displayed amongst each other on their end, presumably suggested by each other in much the same way we've been doing for us?
Rick Healey wrote:Well, one obvious concern is the number of YMMV tropes on the Character page. I have a dream of seeing absolutely no orange dots on any of the The Wall Will Fall pages.
I do think it'd be best to stop requesting others add tropes, and also cut tropes that have nothing to do with the game (I know for a fact that none of you are actually packing weapons that matter in this ARG; I didn't launch Weapon Of Choice all those years ago so that folks could just cite it for their favorite weapon). Folks have troper pages (or can make ones) if they want to add what they feel represents themselves; the page for the game should describe what's in the game.
Also, Adell's rule isn't necessarily the best one. If a character demonstrates the same trope in their original universe and in our game, it makes sense to cite them for that in both. For example, Cheshire Cat gets cited as Perpetual Smiler in both (well, up until OOC Is Serious Business got invoked in the ARG). However, Poirot was not the Big Eater in our game that he was in the original canon, so he wouldn't get cited for that.
In short, add the tropes that actually happened in the ARG, be it for the characters or the players.


Pixelmage wrote:Uh... Guys...
That will make me request a lock for this thread, you know? We're not adding tropes like that anymore. The ARG is over, so from now on it's cleanup time.
I'll still wait on requesting a lock because of one condition to add tropes: Link to the Archives of the ARG (Forum posts, twitter interactions) with evidence of the trope.
And I'll note that, just because you snarked 1 single time and linked to that post it'll not make you have Deadpan Snarker, for instance. Consistency should be one really big factor.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest